Capacity, not software.
Miss Lucy isn't one more subscription that makes you do the work a little faster. She does the work — and gives you back roughly ten hours of output for every hour you put in.
output for every hour you give her
Research, a first draft, the citations checked — in parallel, not in sequence.
The part only a lawyer can do — and the part clients actually pay for.
A database makes you do the work faster.
Manupatra, SCC Online, Indian Kanoon — they hand you results and a search box. You still read, synthesise, draft and cite. The hours are still yours to spend.
Miss Lucy does the work, and shows it.
She researches the point, drafts the document, checks the citations and remembers the matter — then shows her reasoning so you can stand behind it. You move from doing the grind to directing it.
So the unit isn't features. It's capacity.
The honest way to price her isn't 'a tool' — it's 'a junior you can't yet afford.' One lawyer with Miss Lucy takes on the matters that used to need two.
Do the math
A plan runs ₹1,000–2,000 a month. An hour of a lawyer's own time is worth many times that. If she saves you even a few hours a month — and she saves far more — she has paid for herself before the second week. That's not a software ROI argument; it's a hiring one.
Hire the junior you can't yet afford.
Draft 2 documents free and ask her anything for 10 days. No card.