A full written opinion, reasoned the way you'd write it.
Question presented, the governing law, the analysis applied to your facts, and a reasoned conclusion. Miss Lucy researches first, then writes the opinion on top of that research — with every citation checked before it reaches you.
What she does
- Writes a complete opinion in the structure you expect — question presented, the relevant statute and case authority, the analysis on your facts, and a reasoned conclusion.
- Grounds the opinion in real research: she runs the deep and case-law passes first, so the reasoning rests on authority she actually pulled, not recollection.
- Carries verified citations only — every reporter cite and section is checked against the knowledge base, and fabricated cites are blocked before they appear.
- Runs a separate fact-checking pass that independently tests the opinion against its own sources before the draft reaches you.
How it works
- 1
Give her the question and the facts
State the issue and the facts the way you'd brief a junior. She asks a clarifying question where the facts are thin rather than guessing.
- 2
She researches before she writes
Statute, the line of authority, the exceptions — she does the case and deep research first, narrating her reasoning, so the opinion stands on real sources.
- 3
She writes the opinion, grounded in that research
The question presented, the law, the application to your facts and a reasoned conclusion — each step tied to the authority she pulled, with checkable pinpoints.
- 4
An independent pass fact-checks it
A separate verification step tests the draft against its sources for drift or unsupported claims before you ever see it. You read the opinion already checked.
“Opinion on whether our client's non-compete clause is enforceable post-employment”
She frames the question, sets out Section 27 of the Contract Act and the line of authority reading restraints of trade, distinguishes the during-employment cases from the post-termination ones, applies the test to your clause and the client's facts, and concludes with the risk plainly stated — flagging the one judgment a court could lean on against you. The cites are verified and the reasoning is on the page for you to test.
By hand vs with Miss Lucy
It replaces the slow first draft — the research, the assembly and the structuring — so you start from a reasoned opinion instead of a blank page.
| The task | By hand | With Miss Lucy |
|---|---|---|
| Pull the law together for the opinion | Research across databases, then assemble the authorities by hand | She researches first and writes the opinion on that foundation |
| Structure the reasoning | Draft question, law, analysis and conclusion from a blank page | A full draft in the expected structure, reasoned step by step |
| Stand behind the citations | Re-verify every cite and pinpoint before you sign | Citations are verified and fabricated ones blocked before delivery |
| Catch reasoning that drifts from the sources | Read the draft back against each authority yourself | An independent pass fact-checks the opinion against its sources |
Where she stops
- It is a first-class draft for you to review and adopt — the professional judgment, and the responsibility for the opinion, stay yours.
- She shows the research and the citations so you can verify the reasoning, not take it on trust.
- She will not invent authority to close a gap; where the law is unsettled or thin, she says so rather than overstating the conclusion.
More capabilities
See it on your own matter.
Draft 2 documents free and ask Miss Lucy anything for 10 days. No card.
Try Pro free